Application Security

Security Code Review. Find Vulnerabilities Before Attackers Do.

Expert manual code review combined with automated security testing (SAST/DAST) to identify vulnerabilities in your applications. We analyze your source code line by line to uncover security flaws that scanners miss.

Manual + Automated
OWASP Top 10
SAST & DAST
Actionable Reports
The Reality

Application Security

Software vulnerabilities are the leading cause of data breaches. Secure code is not optional—it's essential.

90%
of apps have security flaws
100:1
developer to security ratio
30%
have critical vulnerabilities
6x
cheaper to fix in development
The Challenge

Security Challenges Development Teams Face

Modern development moves fast, but security often struggles to keep pace. From AI-generated code to complex supply chains—these challenges put your applications and data at risk.

AI & Vibe Coding Risks

GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and "vibe coding" accelerate development but introduce code no human fully reviewed. AI-generated code often contains hidden vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and hallucinated APIs.

AI LLM Copilot

Developer Security Gap

Developers are experts in building features, not security. The 100:1 developer-to-security ratio means vulnerabilities slip through every sprint.

Training Skills

Supply Chain Complexity

Modern applications rely on hundreds of third-party libraries and dependencies. One compromised package can expose your entire stack—as Log4Shell and SolarWinds proved.

Dependencies SBOM

Speed vs. Security Trade-offs

Pressure to ship fast means security reviews get skipped or rushed. Each release accumulates technical debt that eventually becomes a breach.

DevOps Agile

Scanner Blind Spots

Automated SAST/DAST tools generate false positives and miss business logic flaws, authentication bypasses, and race conditions. Without expert analysis, critical issues go undetected.

SAST DAST

Legacy Code Burden

Inherited codebases contain years of accumulated vulnerabilities. No one remembers why security decisions were made—or weren't made.

Technical Debt

Compliance Mandates

PCI-DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR all require demonstrable secure development practices. Auditors demand evidence of code security.

Compliance Audit

Outsourced Development

Third-party developers and agencies build code without visibility into your security standards. Trust but verify—external code needs independent review.

Vendors Contractors

Frequent Technology Changes

New frameworks, languages, and paradigms emerge constantly. Security teams struggle to keep expertise current across an ever-expanding landscape.

Innovation Training
Your Advantage

8 Ways Code Review Makes

Security code review transforms application security from a cost center to a competitive advantage.

Detect Vulnerabilities Early

Find and fix security issues during development, not after attackers exploit them in production.

For Development Teams

Catch OWASP Top 10, injection flaws, and logic bugs before they reach production

For Leadership

Reduce breach risk and avoid costly incident response

Reduce Remediation Costs

Fixing vulnerabilities in development is 6x cheaper than fixing them in production, and 100x cheaper than post-breach.

For Development Teams

Fix issues when context is fresh and code is still being worked on

For Leadership

Lower total cost of ownership for application security

Increase Code Visibility

Gain deep understanding of how your applications work from a security perspective.

For Development Teams

Understand security implications of architectural decisions

For Leadership

Make informed decisions about technical investments

Build Security into SDLC

Regular reviews embed security best practices into your development culture.

For Development Teams

Learn from expert feedback and improve secure coding skills

For Leadership

Demonstrate due diligence and mature security practices

Validate Third-Party Code

Ensure outsourced development and open-source components meet your security standards.

For Development Teams

Verify vendor code quality and dependency security

For Leadership

Reduce supply chain risk and vendor liability

Support Compliance

Provide evidence of secure development practices for auditors and certification bodies.

For Development Teams

Generate documentation required for PCI-DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001

For Leadership

Satisfy regulatory requirements and customer security questionnaires

Testing Services

Comprehensive Testing Categories

We combine multiple testing methodologies to provide comprehensive coverage of your application security posture.

Expert Human Analysis

Our security engineers manually review your source code line-by-line, identifying vulnerabilities that automated tools miss. We analyze business logic, authentication flows, authorization controls, and data handling.

Learn More
Authentication & Authorization flaws
Session Management vulnerabilities
Business Logic bypass opportunities
Cryptographic implementation errors
Input Validation & Output Encoding
Error Handling & Logging issues
Configuration Security problems
Sensitive Data Exposure risks
Our Methodology

How our code review engagement works

A structured approach combining automated scanning with expert manual analysis for comprehensive coverage.

01
Day 1-2

Scoping & Planning

We understand your application architecture, technology stack, and security concerns. Together we define scope, access requirements, and timeline.

Architecture review Technology inventory Access provisioning Scope definition Priority areas identification Timeline agreement
02
Day 2-3

Automated Analysis

We run enterprise-grade SAST tools across your codebase to identify common vulnerability patterns and create a baseline for manual analysis.

SAST scanning Dependency analysis Secret detection Code quality review False positive filtering Initial findings triage
03
Day 3-8

Manual Code Review

Our security engineers dive deep into your code, focusing on high-risk areas, authentication flows, data handling, and business logic.

Authentication review Authorization analysis Input validation Cryptography assessment Business logic testing Data flow tracing
04
Day 6-9

Dynamic Testing

We complement static analysis with runtime testing, verifying vulnerabilities are exploitable and identifying issues only visible during execution.

DAST scanning Runtime verification Exploit validation Integration testing API security testing Session analysis
05
Day 9-11

Analysis & Reporting

We analyze all findings, eliminate false positives, prioritize by risk, and create comprehensive documentation with remediation guidance.

Finding validation Risk scoring Root cause analysis Remediation guidance Executive summary Technical recommendations
06
Day 12+

Delivery & Support

We present findings to your team, answer questions, and provide ongoing support during remediation including free retesting.

Findings walkthrough Developer training Remediation support Retesting Knowledge transfer Secure coding guidance
What You Receive

Comprehensive Deliverables, Actionable Results

Every engagement produces detailed documentation that enables your team to understand, prioritize, and remediate identified vulnerabilities.

Executive Summary

High-level overview for leadership with risk ratings, business impact, and strategic recommendations.

  • Risk posture score
  • Business impact analysis
  • Strategic recommendations
  • Compliance mapping

Technical Findings Report

Detailed vulnerability documentation with affected code locations, exploitation scenarios, and proof of concept.

  • Code snippets
  • Exploitation steps
  • CVSS scoring
  • CWE classification
  • File and line references

Remediation Guidance

Step-by-step fix instructions for each vulnerability with secure code examples in your language.

  • Fix code samples
  • Library recommendations
  • Configuration changes
  • Testing procedures

SAST/DAST Scan Results

Full automated tool output with false positives removed and findings correlated with manual analysis.

  • Dependency vulnerabilities
  • Code quality metrics
  • Coverage reports
  • Trending analysis

Security Architecture Review

Assessment of your application architecture with recommendations for security improvements.

  • Threat model diagram
  • Trust boundaries
  • Data flow analysis
  • Design recommendations

Retesting & Attestation

Free retesting to verify remediations and formal attestation letter for compliance requirements.

  • Verification testing
  • Attestation letter
  • Delta report
  • Compliance evidence

Team Photo

50+

Security Experts

24/7

Monitoring

Real-Time Visibility

Track progress in your portal

Access findings as they're discovered through our Red Team Cockpit. No waiting for the final report—see vulnerabilities in real-time.

  • Live findings feed as issues are discovered
  • Code snippets with syntax highlighting
  • Direct communication with reviewers
  • Export reports in multiple formats
Meet the Team
Technology Coverage

Languages & Frameworks We Support

Our security engineers have deep expertise across 100+ programming languages and frameworks. From mainstream enterprise stacks to specialized and legacy technologies—we've got you covered.

JavaScript/TypeScript

Python

Java

C# / .NET

PHP

Ruby

Go (Golang)

Rust

C / C++

Mobile (iOS)

Mobile (Android)

Cross-Platform

Scripting Languages

Data & ML

Legacy Systems

Smart Contracts

Common Questions

Frequently asked questions

Typical engagements run 2-3 weeks for small to medium applications, including automated scanning, manual review, and reporting. Larger codebases or multiple applications may take longer. We provide accurate timelines after our initial scoping call.
We typically need read-only access to your source code repository (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.). For DAST testing, we need access to a staging environment. We sign NDAs and can work within your security requirements.
Automated tools (SAST/DAST) are excellent at finding common vulnerability patterns but generate false positives and miss business logic flaws. Manual review catches architectural issues, authentication bypass, race conditions, and logic flaws that scanners cannot identify.
We have expertise in all major languages including JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, PHP, Ruby, Go, Swift, and Kotlin. Our team can also review less common languages—contact us to discuss your specific stack.
We test against OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP Mobile Top 10, CWE/SANS Top 25, and your specific compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, etc.).
We treat your code with the same care as our own. All reviews are conducted by vetted security engineers under NDA. We can work within your VPN, use your secure collaboration tools, or conduct on-site reviews if required.
Yes! Every engagement includes free retesting to verify your remediations are effective. We provide updated reports showing resolved findings and any new issues introduced during fixes.
Absolutely. We can help you implement SAST tools in your CI/CD pipeline for continuous security testing. We also offer ongoing advisory services to review scan results and triage findings.

"Bit Sentinel's code review found a critical authentication bypass our internal scans completely missed. Their detailed remediation guidance made fixing it straightforward. We now engage them before every major release."

SD

CTO

European FinTech

Security Expertise You Can Trust

Our code reviewers are active security researchers with real-world offensive experience

OSCP OSWE OSEP CREST CEH

Ready to Secure Your Application Code?

Don't wait for attackers to find your vulnerabilities. Our expert security engineers will analyze your code and provide actionable remediation guidance.